The government has their hand in every policy, department, and discussion. This becomes a problem, because they cannot effectively deal with issues. Once they deal with one problem another pops up, and sometimes because of what they did somewhere else.
Posted
Mar 29, 2021
jweiks
If “creative destruction” is a pillar of capitalism, then “big government” is its antithesis. “Big government” cannot tolerate uncertainty or disruption. It believes that all of society’s needs are knowable and addressable. Through this belief the government attempts to dictate, legislate, and control outcomes. Any reduction in government increases its own uncertainty and concedes that its abilities have limitations. If it cannot permit itself to get smaller, then it can only get bigger. The question is how can we bring “creative destruction” to our government entities in a way that allows them to enjoy the benefits of renewal while continuously maintaining fundamental governmental responsibilities?
Responses
The government has their hand in every policy, department, and discussion. This becomes a problem, because they cannot effectively deal with issues. Once they deal with one problem another pops up, and sometimes because of what they did somewhere else.
If “creative destruction” is a pillar of capitalism, then “big government” is its antithesis. “Big government” cannot tolerate uncertainty or disruption. It believes that all of society’s needs are knowable and addressable. Through this belief the government attempts to dictate, legislate, and control outcomes. Any reduction in government increases its own uncertainty and concedes that its abilities have limitations. If it cannot permit itself to get smaller, then it can only get bigger. The question is how can we bring “creative destruction” to our government entities in a way that allows them to enjoy the benefits of renewal while continuously maintaining fundamental governmental responsibilities?